Skip to Content
Call Us Today! 206-207-4776
Top
Embezzlement

Embezzlement Defense Lawyer in Seattle

Direct Attorney Involvement in Every Embezzlement Case

Embezzlement allegations often arise from access that was initially lawful, such as control over company accounts, payroll systems, expense cards, client funds, or business property. The central dispute may be whether a transaction was unauthorized and made with criminal intent rather than permission, mistake, or an accounting error.

I defend people accused of embezzlement and other white collar crimes in Seattle. Before answering investigators’ questions, surrendering records, or trying to explain a disputed transaction, speak with me about what authorities are alleging and which evidence may affect your case.

Call (206) 207-4776 for a free initial consultation about an investigation, summons, arrest, charge, subpoena, or request for financial records.

How Washington Law Treats Theft by Embezzlement

Washington generally prosecutes embezzlement under its theft statutes rather than as a separate offense bearing that name. Under RCW 9A.56.020, theft can include wrongfully obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over another person’s property or services with intent to deprive the owner. The statute also addresses control obtained through deception and the appropriation of lost or misdelivered property or services.

The alleged value can affect the charged degree, although other facts and statutory provisions may also apply. First-degree theft may apply above $5,000, second-degree theft may apply above $750 and up to $5,000, and third-degree theft may apply at $750 or less. The classification and possible consequences depend on the alleged conduct, evidence, charged degree, and applicable law.

Evidence That Can Shape an Embezzlement Defense

A financial discrepancy alone doesn’t resolve the legal questions of authority and intent. I examine whether the accused had permission to access, transfer, reimburse, retain, or use the funds and whether the records accurately reflect what occurred.

Relevant evidence may include:

  • Bank and accounting records: Statements, ledgers, journal entries, transfers, invoices, and reconciliations
  • Workplace records: Payroll entries, expense reports, reimbursement policies, access logs, and company procedures
  • Authority documents: Contracts, account permissions, operating agreements, and written approvals
  • Communications: Emails, text messages, meeting notes, and instructions concerning the disputed property
  • Investigative materials: Reports, recorded statements, warrants, and records obtained during the criminal investigation

I also assess whether the prosecution can prove each required element and whether searches, compelled statements, or other investigative methods raise suppression or admissibility issues. Don’t alter, discard, or conceal potentially relevant materials. I can advise you on preserving and addressing them appropriately.

What to Expect During the Seattle Defense Process

A case may begin with internal workplace questions, contact from law enforcement, a summons, an arrest, or formal charges. The appropriate response depends on what investigators and prosecutors have already done, so I first identify the case’s current stage and any immediate deadlines.

My preparation can include reviewing police reports, requesting discovery, investigating your account of events, analyzing records and communications, filing appropriate pretrial motions, negotiating with prosecutors, and preparing for trial. Discovery consists of the evidence and information exchanged in a criminal case. I also consider how available options could affect your employment, professional license, finances, and reputation.

State and federal investigations are distinct. An allegation involving business funds doesn’t automatically become a federal matter. The investigating agency, alleged conduct, and applicable statutes determine which system is involved.

Direct Representation From Matthew T. Hale

I personally handle clients’ cases rather than passing substantive defense work to a junior associate. Since founding Hale Law Enterprises in 1998, I’ve handled thousands of Washington criminal cases, including serious charges involving executives, professional athletes, and people confronting the justice system for the first time.

I pair detailed preparation with clear communication, explaining the accusation, evidence, procedural choices, and potential consequences so you can make informed decisions. I’m a member of the Washington State Trial Lawyers Association and the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Consultations are available in English and Spanish.

Embezzlement Cases in Seattle & King County Courts

The court, hearing schedule, and procedural requirements depend on the charged offense and how prosecutors file the case. Serious adult criminal cases in King County may proceed in the Criminal Department of King County Superior Court. My familiarity with local prosecutors, court expectations, and Washington criminal procedure informs my preparation for hearings, negotiations, motions, and trial.

Discuss the Allegation Before Making Your Next Decision

A free initial consultation allows you to discuss what happened, what authorities have requested, and which records may matter. I can evaluate the available information, explain potential next steps, and answer your questions without a financial obligation for that first conversation. I’m available by phone 24/7 for urgent criminal defense concerns.

Call (206) 207-4776 to discuss your Seattle embezzlement case directly with me.

Our Real Results

  • City of Edmonds v. L.V.

    December 2025 - Defendant charged with DUI and 4 other criminal charges. We were able to get the DUI reduced to negligent and all other charges dropped.

  • City of Marysville v. J.H.

    Criminal Charge Dismissed 9/5/2024

  • City of Shoreline v. X.L.

    December 2025 - Criminal theft charge dismissed. Defendant was charged with theft, immigration consequences if convicted, and had a warrant out for their arrest. Warrant dropped, case dismissed.

  • DOL v. J.N.

    Department of Licensing hearing. Case dismissed so client was not suspended for a DUI charge.

  • DOL v. K.M.

    Department of Licensing DUI hearing. Case dismissed, client did not lose license on a DUI charge.

  • DOL v. M.M.

    Department of Licensing hearing. Case dismissed so client not suspended on a DUI charge.

Associations

  • Washington State Bar Association
  • State Bar of Texas
  • WACDL

PUT HALE LAW ENTERPRISES ON YOUR SIDE

WE WORK TOWARDS GETTING THE CHARGES DROPPED
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Hale Law Enterprises at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy