Securities Fraud Defense in Seattle
You Work Directly With Me on Complex Financial Allegations
A securities fraud investigation can place your trading activity, investor communications, financial records, and business relationships under scrutiny before any charge is filed. At Hale Law Enterprises, I provide direct criminal-defense counsel to individuals, investment professionals, executives, and business owners facing accusations connected to securities transactions.
I am Attorney Matthew T. Hale, and I personally handle your case rather than passing clients to junior associates. I can assess the criminal implications of an inquiry, explain your rights, and distinguish a potential prosecution from a regulatory investigation or civil dispute.
Call (206) 207-4776 for a free initial consultation with a Seattle securities fraud attorney. I am available 24/7 for urgent criminal-defense concerns.
Securities Fraud Under Washington & Federal Law
The Washington Securities Act prohibits deceptive conduct connected to the offer, sale, or purchase of securities. An allegation may involve a material misrepresentation, which is a false statement about information a reasonable investor would consider important, or the omission of such information.
Conduct examined in state or federal securities matters may include:
- Insider trading: Buying or selling securities based on material information that isn’t publicly available when its use may violate a legal duty.
- Market manipulation: Conduct allegedly intended to create an artificial price, trading volume, or appearance of market activity.
- Investment misrepresentations: False or misleading statements about company finances, investment risks, expected returns, or the use of investor funds.
- Fraudulent trading practices: Alleged pump-and-dump schemes, coordinated transactions, spoofing, or wash trading.
- Unregistered activity: Questions about whether securities, offerings, brokers, or dealers met applicable registration requirements.
The same events can lead to proceedings with different agencies, courts, procedures, and legal standards. The Securities and Exchange Commission may investigate and pursue civil enforcement, while the Department of Justice may investigate and prosecute federal crimes. Private investors may also bring civil claims.
When to Contact Criminal-Defense Counsel
You don’t have to wait for an arrest or indictment to seek legal advice. Counsel may become necessary after you receive an interview request, subpoena, search warrant, charging document, enforcement notice, or target letter. A target letter is a formal notice that prosecutors consider someone a potential criminal defendant.
I have handled thousands of criminal cases throughout Washington, including serious allegations involving executives and other professionals. My white-collar crime practice covers fraud, financial crimes, embezzlement, money laundering, forgery, and computer crimes. A securities-related inquiry can also affect your employment, professional licensing, finances, business relationships, and communications with investors or regulators.
Reviewing the Evidence & the Allegations
Before you respond to investigators or produce records, I examine the conduct under investigation, the agencies involved, and the procedural stage of the case. I also explain your rights and legal options so you can make informed decisions about your next steps.
Key Defense Issues I Examine
A detailed assessment may address:
- What statements were made, who received them, and whether the information was accurate when communicated.
- What you knew and intended at each point in the transaction timeline.
- Whether allegedly omitted information was material to an investment decision.
- How trading data, emails, text messages, account records, and financial statements were obtained and interpreted.
- Whether transactions were authorized and accurately documented.
- Whether investigators followed constitutional and procedural requirements when obtaining evidence.
Jurisdiction & Venue
A federal criminal case in the Seattle area may proceed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. A Washington felony prosecution may be heard in King County Superior Court. The forum determines which laws and procedures apply and what consequences may follow.
Direct Representation From Matthew T. Hale
You work directly with me throughout your case. I focus on detailed preparation, clear explanations, and candid communication about the allegations, the evidence, and the decisions ahead.
I am a member of the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Washington State Trial Lawyers Association. I provide consultations and defense services in English and Spanish, and initial consultations are free.
Get Clarity Before Responding to Investigators
If you’ve received a subpoena, interview request, search warrant, enforcement notice, or criminal charge, preserve all relevant documents and communications. Don’t alter or destroy records or make substantive statements about the allegations before obtaining legal advice.
During your consultation, I can review what prompted the inquiry, which agencies are involved, what documents you received, and whether the situation involves criminal, regulatory, civil, or overlapping proceedings.
Call (206) 207-4776 for a free consultation with me at Hale Law Enterprises. I am available 24/7 to discuss your immediate concerns and next steps.
Our Real Results
-
City of Edmonds v. L.V.
December 2025 - Defendant charged with DUI and 4 other criminal charges. We were able to get the DUI reduced to negligent and all other charges dropped.
-
City of Marysville v. J.H.
Criminal Charge Dismissed 9/5/2024
-
City of Shoreline v. X.L.
December 2025 - Criminal theft charge dismissed. Defendant was charged with theft, immigration consequences if convicted, and had a warrant out for their arrest. Warrant dropped, case dismissed.
-
DOL v. J.N.
Department of Licensing hearing. Case dismissed so client was not suspended for a DUI charge.
-
DOL v. K.M.
Department of Licensing DUI hearing. Case dismissed, client did not lose license on a DUI charge.
-
DOL v. M.M.
Department of Licensing hearing. Case dismissed so client not suspended on a DUI charge.